Star News (right and proper reporter Wang Weiwei) January 17 this year, the Japanese newspaper has reported that "girls accused of cheating troubles of mental illness, the family claims 1.93 million." April 11, Court of First Instance (Shushan District Court) judgment time compensation girls Anhui Agricultural University Hsiao (a pseudonym) 20 million. After receiving the verdict, both the school and the parents appealed. Parents raised more than 150 million in damages, the school insisted that the first instance judgment in the fact-finding errors. Yesterday, the case in the Hefei Intermediate People's Court.
Focus one: cheating penalty decision whether fault?
Yesterday 9:30, Hsiao's 70-year-old father of Yin and Hsiao's Third Sister Ayo (a pseudonym) sitting in the dock. The plaintiff gallery sitting only one person, he said, the attorney himself both as a school, is a substitute teacher Hsiao sixth semester and seventh semester, a professor of legal courses.
The second trial, both sides of the school to give her height cheating penalty decision whether fault there is a huge controversy.
The school believes that first of all, this event occurred in 2003, has more than one year statute of limitations. Secondly, when the invigilator said that during the examination, the boys next to Zhou Hsiao because not to do so, Hsiao own papers and Zhou swap. In addition, 10 years after the incident, the school has no obligation to the custody of the evidence Hsiao cheating in exams.
In this regard, Hsiao's attorney, said the school's punishment there is no fault, no doubt. "Hsiao no cheating, Zhou possible cheating. Zhou Hsiao copy papers, the school has to deal with two of the same punishment is inappropriate."
Hsiao dormitory students also said that after being punished, Hsiao often crying in the bedroom, has said, "I did not copy, I did not copy" so, often sleeping roommate was awakened. In addition, the school now has not come up with the year Hsiao papers, or documents related to prove cheating.
Focus two: whether the penalty decision related illness?
In addition to the school cheating penalty is appropriate, the two sides also discussed whether Hsiao liable for damages, compensation costs, such as whether to have a legal basis to argue.
The school says Ann CAU 1,000 people punished for cheating on exams, there is only punishment troubles her a schizophrenic person. Hsiao was cheating for bad behavior, the school's punishment is very slight, in fact, to make such a disposition is caring performance. Moreover, Hsiao appeared the situation today can be said to be a fruit usually caused by, and can not be attributed solely to the school's action. By the relevant identification, Hsiao own predisposition for schizophrenia in the face after graduation to find work under pressure, and marriage and family conflicts and other external stimuli, which leads to her situation today.
Hsiao attorney said, after being informed of the punishment Hsiao, schools did not notify his family, leading to the first time the family was unable to understand the situation,adidas vibetouch adidas adizero messi, to help her out of the psychological shadow. Secondly, Hsiao schizophrenia, from school wronged her cheating caused.
Hsiao father thought, the school did not investigate and verify there is no right of appeal to Hsiao reasonable, but given directly to the action, until now none get a diploma. In this regard, the school said Hsiao diploma, the Ministry of Education can find online, but still owes part of her height is not paid tuition, so the school is not paid.